Content starts here
CLOSE ×

Search

AARP AARP States North Carolina Advocacy

Older North Carolinians Strongly Support Measure to Stop Age Discrimination at Work

RALEIGH - Older North Carolinians overwhelmingly support bipartisan legislation to combat age discrimination in the workplace, a new AARP survey

age-discrimination-in-the-workplace

shows.

A March 2014 poll of registered voters ages 50 and older found a remarkable 82 percent favor passage of the bipartisan "Protecting Older Workers against Discrimination Act" (POWADA).

Significantly, 57 percent of ALL those interviewed said they "strongly" endorsed the bill.  In contrast, only 11 percent oppose passage, the survey reported.

"This AARP survey confirms what Tarheels already know: huge majorities demand fairness for older workers," said AARP State President Robert Palombo. “And that public support for fairness bridges all political ideologies,” he added while confirming the survey’s finding that at least three-fourths of moderates, liberals, and conservatives endorse POWADA.

The legislation in Congress, sponsored by Republican Chuck Grassley and Democratic Senators Tom Harkin and Patrick Leahy, is designed to overturn a divided (5-4) U.S. Supreme Court decision (Gross v. FBL Financial Services) that made it much more difficult  for older workers to prove claims of illegal bias based on age.

The survey found that about one-in-four reported that they or someone they know has experienced age discrimination.

The Gross decision substantially toughened the standard that older workers must meet in order to prove that his or her employer violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Unfortunately, the decision means many older workers will never see their day in court, and it is now being applied by some courts to restrict the rights of employees in other types of employment discrimination cases too For example, a federal court of appeals in Cincinnati applied the Gross ruling to limit rights to challenge disability-based bias under federal law.

For decades, if an older worker showed that age was one motivating factor in an adverse employment decision, even if other motives also played a role, the employer had to prove that it would have made the same decision without considering the employee’s age. Since the Gross decision, employees instead must prove that the employer would not have taken the adverse action "but for" their age -- in other words, that age played the determining role -- a significantly higher standard of proof.

The legislation would restore the old standard and help ensure that employees have a more level playing field when fighting age discrimination in court.

The AARP survey of North Carolinians conducted by telephone from March 8-14, found 93 percent think older Americans should be protected from age discrimination just like they are from sex or race discrimination, and 91 percent agreed that "Congress needs to do more to ensure people over 50 continue to have an equal opportunity to work for as long as they want or need to - regardless of their age." Once again, only 11 percent opposed Congressional action, the survey said.

Palombo concluded, “The age discrimination bill is gaining traction at a difficult time for older workers. National unemployment has declined somewhat since the official end of the Great Recession in 2009, but it remains high. And the average length of unemployment between jobs for older workers is at an all-time high -- well over a year.  Of those polled in North Carolina, 81 percent said they believe "age would be an obstacle to finding work."

Photo by: Blogcritic via Bing

About AARP North Carolina
Contact information and more from your state office. Learn what we are doing to champion social change and help you live your best life.