AARP’s FREE Online Q&A Has Answers
SCOTUS_King v Burwell
In a 6-3 decision issued Thursday, June 25, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of  King v Burwell that federal subsidies for people to buy insurance through the Affordable Care Act (Act) are constitutional.  The issue in the case was whether subsidies would only be allowed if the subsidies were given through exchanges that the states set up themselves.  Because 34 declined to set up their own exchanges and defaulted to the federal exchanges instead, the question was whether the provision of subsidies through the federal exchange was authorized by the Act.  According to Utah Policy, approximately 87 percent of enrollees in the federal exchanges receive subsidies to buy health insurance, or about 6.4 million people according to the Obama administration.  In Utah, 67 percent of Utahns who use the federal exchange will be able to keep their subsidies.
With the Utah House failing to support SB164 Healthy Utah during a committee hearing Wednesday night—advancing HB446 Utah Cares instead—hundreds rallied at the capitol Thursday, March 4, in support of Governor Herbert’s bill.   AARP Utah State Director joined legislators, religious leaders, citizen advocates, and health professionals to ask, "What's the hold up?"  His comments are below:
Top Ten Things You Should Know about the Affordable Care Act
Search AARP Utah